|
Nothing happens between people or groups or nations that don’t reflect the spiritual relationships between them. Darfur is a current example of groups of energetic beings learning or not learning about their human experience.
Before reading this, if you’d like to learn more about current activity revolving around UN and Darfur, click here: http://hrw.org/doc?t=africa&c=darfur. If you are interested in how you can help, you can start with the above web site or use the search terms such as “Darfur assistance”.
Physical events:
In early 2003, a rebel group from a dry and poor area of the Sudan in Africa started attacking government targets,
sending a message that the Darfur region and its black African farmers were being neglected by Khartoum in favor of the region’s nomadic Arabs.
For years, the tensions that were building in Darfur over land and grazing rights between the black farmers and the Arabs came to a head with these attacks. In response, Khartoum claims to formed “self-defense” groups of armed militias to handle the rebel group. But, the government denies that any of these militias were the Janjaweed – a group accused of “cleansing” black Africans from the region.
Black Africans forced from their homesteads, report that following government air raids, the Janjaweed follow on horseback and camel, killing men, raping women, then stealing what they can find.
Since this started in 2003, many US and human rights groups stated that these raids constitute genocide and that some intervention must take place. However, a UN investigation team reported from the Sudan that no intentional genocide was taking place, even if war crimes were committed.
From this point forward to present day, the UN has written, and rewritten resolutions that would put adequate pressure on the Khartoum government and the arms-supplying UN member nation to help end the conflict. As well, peace talks between the warring factions have not been successful, but future talks may take place. Because the fighting continues, many areas of the Darfur regions are inaccessible by relief groups.
Hundreds of thousands have died. The UN has yet to find agreement among its members in order to draft a successful resolution. Relief workers do what they can, but many in need cannot be reached due to the danger level.
Spiritual Activity:
The conflict in Darfur is a physical result of two groups of people (and their energetic components – spirit) that are learning about the dichotomy of organizational power on one end and individual human freedoms on the other end. Darfur is the most recent manifestation of these two groups.
For centuries, these groups have been involved in creating other world events with this dichotomy at their centers. The members of both groups have incarnated on both sides of this dichotomy, so there is no pure good guy/bad guy in this exchange – only eventual awareness by any one member which allows them to free themselves from the dichotomy and move on to other experiences.
Parties involved:
Group 1: The United Nations council and its member nations.
Group 2: Relief worker and peacekeeping groups as well as three or four UN member nation representatives.
Victims: Arab nomads and black African farmers: both the refugees and the armed groups on both sides.
Both of these groups of beings are living in the circumstances created by Groups 1 and 2.
Description of Group 1:
This group is experiencing the “organizational power” end of the dichotomy. For this group, global organizational control is more important than the individual’s human condition.
This group tends to make decisions without seriously taking into account the connectedness of all life and action. Only the continuation of the administration of global affairs is important. This group does consider preservation of the whole planet, but in terms of preserving the structures of control.
In present day, the UN is the manifestation of this global organizational structure focused on preserving itself. This group is hoping the Darfur conflict will burn itself out through attrition of life and resources. It doesn’t want to acknowledge that they were involved in creating the climate for this problem.
Another core belief within this group is that a black life is not worth as much as a white life, and money and power is worth more than any one life. That is the nature of this end of the dichotomy.
However, within the last ten years, the structures of control have changed. There is a sense of conflict in the UN between those who which to preserve the structure and those who see that a strong global leadership organization can exist with individual human rights as its first consideration.
Description of Group 2:
This group is experiencing the individual human freedoms end of this dichotomy. This group values life regardless – all life. They focus on helping one person at a time if that’s the only way they can do it. They work to validate wellness and spirit on an individual level.
A number of relief workers and several human rights organizations, and a few UN member nation representatives comprise this group. They would like to evolve the spiritual intent of Group 1, thereby eliminating the dichotomy altogether. Essentially, the physical outcome would be a philosophical shift within the UN, or the creation of a global affairs administrative body that put human rights before nationalism, natural resources, politics, race, religion, money, etc.
Group 2 is paying a karma debt and some members are ascended guides with no karmic debt. The members of Group 2 were the oppressors in the dichotomy last lifetime, while Group 1 were formerly the oppressed peoples of a previous historical conflict.
Description of the Victims:
The members of the Victims have been switching places between the Arabs and the Black farmers. The victims are the product/child of the colonial interference with the culture. Group 2 is in the process of paying their debt through direct assistance to those they have previously oppressed. Group 1 is hoping the problem will just go away so they don’t have to keep looking at what they created.
The situation in Darfur can change for the better if:
1. enough relief workers (Group 2) can access the Victims;
2. peace talks between the warring parties among the Victims can be successful;
3. an adequate intervention plan can be ratified by the UN, then acted upon. [ Back ] |
